Title : Living green
Author : 이찬승
Publisher/year : 능률/2008
Vocabularies :
Sustainable - 지속가능한
Drainage - 배수
Pack - 싸다(포장)
Meet demand - 수요를 만족시키다.
Summary :
As industry is developed, Because of Fatory's waste, waste gas, and so on. the environment is more contaminated.
In recent years, many people have joined the growing movement for sustainable development.
As a result, people build green building, use big window, make gardens on top of the building.
It is expected to improve these contamination.
Comment :
I think it's very good thing.
So, people should do this like using bing window and solar heat system. Furthermore, We ( who are students or normal person ) shouldn't do work that contaminates our environment. If you preserve our environment, we can live in clear world.
2009년 5월 26일 화요일
2009년 5월 6일 수요일
Government budget for Conservation vs Social welfare
Topic : The limited governmental budget should be spent on conserving the world heritage sites rather than providing social welfare service (providing food, shelters and part-time jobs for the homeless.)
In my opinion, I think that the governmental budget should be spent on conserving the world heritage sites rather than providing social welfare service.
Now, Our economy is terrible. So, social welfare service is very important. but many cultural assets are destroyed by many ways like acid rain or human's senseless behavior.
I think we should conserve our cultural assets. Because a government will hire many person who doesn't have job. then, more people can earn more money and cultural assets are conserved.
Furthermore, A government can collect tax. Also, People who earn money use money for many things, and then many company will succeed. then they also pay tax.
So, A government can earn public money, our economy will also be good.
A government will spend more money to conserve cultural assets. and more and more people will be hired and our economy will also be more better.
So, I think using limited budget for conserving the cultural assets is killing two birds with one stone. We should use limit budget for conserving the cultural assets.
In my opinion, I think that the governmental budget should be spent on conserving the world heritage sites rather than providing social welfare service.
Now, Our economy is terrible. So, social welfare service is very important. but many cultural assets are destroyed by many ways like acid rain or human's senseless behavior.
I think we should conserve our cultural assets. Because a government will hire many person who doesn't have job. then, more people can earn more money and cultural assets are conserved.
Furthermore, A government can collect tax. Also, People who earn money use money for many things, and then many company will succeed. then they also pay tax.
So, A government can earn public money, our economy will also be good.
A government will spend more money to conserve cultural assets. and more and more people will be hired and our economy will also be more better.
So, I think using limited budget for conserving the cultural assets is killing two birds with one stone. We should use limit budget for conserving the cultural assets.
피드 구독하기:
글 (Atom)